TheRoadVirus
High-Steppin' Mo-Sheen
Disregard. 

Last edited:
Good point, I've not actually seen my engine warm up faster since I normally start driving before it gets to full operating temp. I guess I should have said "I've HEARD" it warms up faster. I'll edit thatpeople talk about the quicker startups, but i don't get y
mine takes forever to warm up and yes, the fan is blowing on it the whole time. but...even with an efan wouldn't it warm up at the same speed? the thermostat won't open until the engine is warm, so y does it matter either way.
it'd make sense if the thermostat was open during warm-up and the fan wasn't blowing. am i missing something?
Yeah but his point is that there is no coolant flowing from radiator to water pump during warm up since the thermostat isn't open, and so the fan pulling air through the fins on the radiator wouldn't cause change in engine temp anyways.Ok... an electric fan isn't spinning until you turn it on or if it's wired to turn on at a certain temperature. Therfore the fan isn't cooling the coolant.. that isn't warmed up. If it's a clutch fan it's always spinning and cooling on startup when it's not required.
Not only are they no value, they can cause major problems if they stop working, which is possible due to their reliability. And they have far less
cooling capacity than a mechanical fan!
They will, however, lighten your wallet!!
Bob I'm not sure I've ever disagreed with anything you've said but I've got to step in and call you out here...
I did the Taurus fan swap on my truck and I'll never look back. The improvement in throttle response over the clutch fan is incredible. No it didn't go and add 40 horsepower but, like I said, there was a noticeable improvement in throttle response and a very small improvement in gas mileage. And rightfully so. The clutch fan adds an incredible amount of weight, and thus load, onto the water pump pulley, and thus adds parasitic draw. And yes the fan is often times disengaged but due to friction in the clutch mechanism it is always going to be spinning SOME, not to mention there is the weight of the clutch mechanism and the arm creating a leaver on the pulley.
I'm not expert but it seems to me that completely removing that fan would offer benefits. I haven't needed to turn on my efan for MONTHS... That's a lot of power/gas that I was wasting spinning that big heavy fan for no reason before. Not to mention that I've also heard the engine warms up faster without the fan spinning.
As for not having a cooling capacity? That depends ENTIRELY on the type of engine, radiator, and fan being used. I know that if I let my truck idle for too long at a stop light and my temp gauge starts to ramp up, I can flip the switch on to LOW speed and watch my gauge drop to normal operating temp in a matter of 20-30 seconds.
Reliability? Okay you got me there... I guess an electrical fan motor would be more prone to going out than a clutch fan... But I do know many guys that have had to replace their clutch fans so this one could be a tossup...
Yeah I don't have facts and numbers to back these things but, but I've done the mod to my truck and I'm willing to put MY reputation on the line and SO BOLDLY declare: the efan conversion is worth EVERY PENNY.
Just my .02
2) Under hood clutter is drastically cut down, thus making the rig easier to work on. For someone that does their own work, this is a big plus. Also, people like frederic that like to put big blocks in small rigs are able to do so with the aid of the e-fan. Space does not allow with the mechanical fan.
I actually bought my kit used from a buddy of mine...(same guy I get all my go fast goodies from) and it is a March underDrive Pulley Set......
JR
Lmao, did you even read his post? He doesn't even have an electric fan. And he also mentioned that in his UDP set his crank pulley was the only smaller pulley. He said the alternator and water pump spin at the exact same rate.
So where are you pulling all your information from? If you've never had an electric fan how do you even know what you're talking about? Oh, I guess you must have gone and done a dyno with and without since that's what you're getting all worked up about.
Show us your source, smartguy.
I don't understand how you can flatout refuse to reason, you're wrong! If you can't figure out why an electric fan puts less parasitic drag on the engine and therefore allows it to spin more freely compared to the clutch driven fan, you've got a problem. It's not a difficult concept to comprehend.
I already saw that RX7 link, I just didn't bother posting about it since it's all heresay. Isn't that what's been bothering you? The buttdyno? I don't see any dyno graphs in either of those links.
And I guess you didn't fully read what you just posted, Bob. That article actually proves the point we've all been arguing with you. Read the bottom. Oh and unless you haven't figured it out yet, with an electric fan you have the choice to have it running or not. And from what I've gathered most people don't have it running very much. Unless they're stuck in traffic and so on.
You haven't fazed me, I'll be still be ordering myself an electric fan and some underdrive pulleys.![]()
with an electric fan you have the choice to have it running or not.
Okay, but the point is that the fan almost NEVER runs.I think both of you are forgetting the load the alternator puts on the engine with the e-fan drawing current.
If you're having problems like this with your efan then you're incompetent and should NOT have installed it in the first place.Let me tell you what happens when you forget that your e-fan is off...........it's possible to burn up your engine!!!
Okay, but the point is that the fan almost NEVER runs.
If you're having problems like this with your efan then you're incompetent and should NOT have installed it in the first place.