89frankenford
Grabber Green Consultant
agree. people are stupid(on the fact that they do NOT take care of their vehicles.....)
Thus the reason for the disclaimer....
JR
Correct, stupid people install K&N air filters!!!!
Thats Bob for you....blanket statements, cheap insults, name calling etc. etc.
You must be some kind of mastermind that knows things that nobody else knows regarding all these things that you say are worthless and only stupid people use yet many people use with good proven results (since links are your favorite thing and you consider them proof, I am sure I can find some), not to mention how MANY of these things sell (K&N is summits #1 seller, or so I am told by someone that works in the warehouse) and how common the Taurus fan (or any efan) thing is. Either that, or you are one of those older guys that refuses to accept anything that goes contrary to your current set of beliefs regardless of what is said to you due to stubborness and an ego.
You know, you haven't come up with one thing to dispute the points I've made in any my posts!!!
Whoa.....if ya'll know each other take it to a PM man....don't call him out like that in a public forum.....
JR
Regarding the value of an e-fan and that a K&N does flow more and will work just fine for filtering as long as it has been maintained properly, I have disputed your points (in this thread and others), and I am not the only one that has done this. You choose to ignore it all however, due to stubborness and your ego.
Yes, the K&N air filter DOES flow more are than the OEM paper filter, and chicken wire flows even more!
See if you can understand this concept:
The MAX airflow an engine will pull (WOT, and MAX RPM) is 500CFM
An OEM paper filter will flow 750CFM
A K&N will flow 950CFM
Now, will there be more airflow if you install the K&N???? The thing to remember, it's the engine pulling the air that limits the airflow, NOT the filter!!
The answer is no, you will only get more dirt and oil passed into the engine....
As far as the thermostat issue goes, I've always been told that the fuel injected/computerized vehicles need 195 degrees before the sensors work correctly. Carbureted vehicles are a different world all together.
I have wondered about this before, and I can't help but think that emissions has something to do with it. Lets say that 180* is the ideal temp for a gas engine, BUT the computer and coolant temp sensor are calibrated to run at 195* for what ever reason. All this meaning that a tuner and someone with some skill would be needed to get the system to run properly at 180*.
If by most efficient you mean the best for emissions. Not necessarily for engine life or power. It'd likely be healthier for an engine to run at 180*, but they use 195* for the stringent emissions nowadays.