Except the Cummins diesel... Ooo that'd piss me off see a GM ruining Cummins.
Why? Daimler already did that before they sold off Chrysler. Daimler hung around just long enough to ruin the Cummins with bluetec technology, but not long enough to fix it.Fuggin' Cummins 6.7 is the diesel from hell right now- makes a Ford 6.0 look the model of reliability.![]()
From someone who watched the Daimler-Chrysler merger, first hand at a dealer level- MB did everything possible to destroy Chrysler. Chrysler came to the wedding altar with a boat load of cash, a fresh product line, and a sales revival in progress.
Daimler first drop-kicked Chrysler's senior management and replaced them with homies that could barely find their way around town, let alone the American Car Market. Then they proceeded to dismantle Mopar's parts distribution network and integrate it into their own. Consider where Mercedes parts come from, versus Mopar, and you see what a disaster this process turned out to be.
While they did share some significant technology, it should be noted that technology per se doesn't sell cars. If it did, Audi would rule the earth.Marketing sells cars- and styling. The German's sucked at both. Good riddence.
i would have to agree with you on that one. the cummins motor is just built extremely well and can handle a shit ton for what it is. the 7.3T is definitely right behind it with the duramax coming in 3rdChrylser comes back out with 5.9 24 valve, with an allison would equal $$.
Cummins is famous dude, reliablity like no other, im sorry hands down cummins
1 cummins 5.9 12 or 24 valve
2 7.3 INternational 444
3 Duracrap
ill be honest with you, if they put a cummins in a chevy pickup, id by it. With allison's planetary clutch assembly in there transmission, there almost bullet proof, matched behind the power of any cummins particular a 5.9 24 valve, with a turned up injection pump and and a bigger turbo. that would the truck to set your standards to.
doubt it will ever happen tho! You can put an allison behind anything now adays with adapaters and what not.
ive had a few beers excuse my spelling and what not
Realistically, if this actually does happen, I see Jeeps, Mini-vans, and Dodge pickups surviving, and the rest of the lineup getting vaporized.
Chrysler has no "ownership" of Cummins, right? So all GM got as far as that's concerned is the right to use the engines in pickups?
What about all the dealerships? And why does GM think this is a good thing for them? I just don't quite get it: Jeep is desirable but can't be THAT big a money-maker, mini-vans are a disappearing market (admittedly one GM never quite hit) and if Dodge just went bankrupt, a bunch of their buyers would wind up at Chevy, anyway.
I'm no businessman, and I don't follow the industry that closely...this just seems looks like GM acquiring a lot of dead weight at a time they REALLY don't need it.
Think of this in different terms Ian. 1) Chrysler has $11 billion cash in the bank. 2) With Chrysler, GM can lay claim to 75% of the domestic Auto Industry... and their workers. That should put them solidly on the Fed's "too big to fail" list- which is what this is really all about.
Didn't Chrysler have some dealings in the past from Renault......when they bought AMC(?) Jeep (for sure) from Renault?