- Moderator
- #21
That is the great beauty of a democracy..you can like what you like and I can like what I like.
As far as the product goes I really have no personal experience with them in the past 20 years as I have not owned one since the early/mid eighties.
At that point I had no real problems with the ones I owned.
Please elaborate where you find this reliabilty in the real world.
I know for a fact (from seeing with my own two eyes) that in the oil, gas, mining etc. you see very few GM products (trucks) as they don't hold up.
Now, anyone can feel free to argue this....but until the person argueing comes out here and sees for themselves, they shouldn't comment.
I'm simply telling you what I see with my own two eyes.
What part of my statement is incorrect?..the numbers you posted show slightly more repairs on the GM than Ford (unless I'm reading it wrong)
Personally I don't give a **** what people own or drive...I own and drive Ford's and will never own anything but...pretty damn cut and dry.
I'm simply telling you what I see with my own two eyes.
What part of my statement is incorrect?..the numbers you posted show slightly more repairs on the GM than Ford (unless I'm reading it wrong)
Personally I don't give a **** what people own or drive...I own and drive Ford's and will never own anything but...pretty damn cut and dry.
The White House intends to boost government subsidies for wealthy buyers of the Chevy Volt and other new-technology vehicles — to $10,000 per buyer.
That mammoth subsidy would cost taxpayers $100 million each year if it is approved by Congress, presuming only 10,000 new-technology autos are sold each year.
But the administration wants to get 1 million new-tech autos on the road by 2015. The subsidy cost of that goal could reach $10 billion.